The Bosman Ruling may have freed footballers from 'slavery' - but the elite now own football
Twenty years ago today, Jean-Marc Bosman won a court case that changed the game forever - but did the Belgian's just victory actually do more harm than good?

Dec. 15, 1995 is one of the most significant dates in football history. For some, it was the day on which footballers were finally empowered. For others, it was the day on which the game stopped being a sport and became a business. As with any dramatic shift in power, the truth lies somewhere in between. What is beyond dispute, though, is that the old system had to change.
In the spring of 1990, Jean-Marc Bosman’s two-year contract with SA Royal Club Liegois was entering its final few months. The Belgian was offered a new deal that would have seen his weekly wage reduced by 75 percent. Unsurprisingly, Bosman rejected it. He was promptly placed on the transfer list.
In May of the same year, Dunkerque made the then 26-year-old a better offer but the French outfit was unable to agree a fee with RC Liegois. Consequently, Bosman, having refused to accept the massive wage cut put to him by RC Liegois, was suspended indefinitely by the Royal Belgian Football Association, leaving him in limbo. It was at this point that Bosman boldly decided to challenge the legality of a system at odds with the European Union's laws on the free movement of workers.
"I went with someone I knew from my neighborhood to the law firm," he explained. "Liege had 15 days to respond and they did not answer. We contacted the Belgian federation and they did not respond. And so the court case started."
It would last five years, meaning Bosman spent what should have been his prime taking on lawyers in a court house rather than opponents on a football field. His sacrifice would not prove in vain, though, with the European Court of Justice eventually ruling in his favor.

Dec. 15, 1995 is one of the most significant dates in football history. For some, it was the day on which footballers were finally empowered. For others, it was the day on which the game stopped being a sport and became a business. As with any dramatic shift in power, the truth lies somewhere in between. What is beyond dispute, though, is that the old system had to change.
In the spring of 1990, Jean-Marc Bosman’s two-year contract with SA Royal Club Liegois was entering its final few months. The Belgian was offered a new deal that would have seen his weekly wage reduced by 75 percent. Unsurprisingly, Bosman rejected it. He was promptly placed on the transfer list.
In May of the same year, Dunkerque made the then 26-year-old a better offer but the French outfit was unable to agree a fee with RC Liegois. Consequently, Bosman, having refused to accept the massive wage cut put to him by RC Liegois, was suspended indefinitely by the Royal Belgian Football Association, leaving him in limbo. It was at this point that Bosman boldly decided to challenge the legality of a system at odds with the European Union's laws on the free movement of workers.
"I went with someone I knew from my neighborhood to the law firm," he explained. "Liege had 15 days to respond and they did not answer. We contacted the Belgian federation and they did not respond. And so the court case started."
It would last five years, meaning Bosman spent what should have been his prime taking on lawyers in a court house rather than opponents on a football field. His sacrifice would not prove in vain, though, with the European Court of Justice eventually ruling in his favor.

Indeed, it feels as if the pendulum of power has swung too much in the players' favor. We have now reached a point at which the wages being paid to players are difficult to justify. Twenty years ago, the Vatican labelled Gianluigi Lentini's €13M transfer from Torino to AC Milan as "an offence to the dignity of work" but the transfer market has become even more ludicrous today, with Gareth Bale becoming the first €100M player two years ago and recent reports claiming that Manchester City would be willing to pay Barcelona talisman Lionel Messi over €1M per week to move to the Emirates.
Of course, the argument can be made that football is now part of the entertainment industry and that players deserve everything they get given that they are the stars of the show. However, it is not just the players who have made millions from the Bosman Ruling but also agents.
Players require proper representation but there is surely something very wrong with a system which resulted in Premier League clubs handing over €180M in agents' fees this year alone? That figure is only going to rise, too, with agents becoming more and more prominent and powerful (see Jorge Mendes' influence at Valencia), making it difficult not to think of super-agent Eric Hall's famous quote: "The terrible thing about my job is that players get 80 percent of my earnings."
Given the money to be made on controlling players, is it any wonder that third-party ownership has now become a major problem. "This also blocks the free movement," Bosman points out. "At times, the players are hostages to bureaucracy. At times, they are not paid, and in these cases, FIFPro, the world union for players, must intervene in order to enforce the contracts of professional players, supervise them and make them feel protected."
Bosman fought the good fight - and won. Footballers everywhere owe him a debt of gratitude. But, 20 years on, football has yet to really come to terms with the fallout or to adequately deal with the repercussions. The Bosman Ruling created more problems than it solved. It was certainly not a disaster for football as Aigner claimed.
"If I could go back, I would not change one iota of what I did," he said last week. "It’s important that the battle continues and that's what FIFPro is doing to look after the rights of players. We’ve won a battle but we haven’t won the war."
Bosman was certainly right to take on the system - it's just a crying shame that healthy competition has been a casualty in the continued pursuit of freedom.
0 komentar: